Court Prioritises Public Convenience
The court expressed concern that widespread barricading and restrictions on public transport could disrupt the daily lives of students, office-goers, senior citizens and other commuters travelling to Delhi from neighbouring areas, including Gurugram and Greater Noida.
It observed that authorities have the responsibility to maintain law and order, but preventive measures must not unnecessarily inconvenience the public. The bench also called for a review of road closures and barricades, allowing traffic to move wherever restrictions were not essential.
Protests Over Chief Election Commissioner
The restrictions were introduced ahead of demonstrations organised by CJP and other groups demanding the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The protests were linked to allegations concerning revisions to electoral rolls, which have become a major point of political controversy.
The Supreme Court’s intervention highlighted the need to balance public safety with citizens’ right to access transport and move freely. The court made it clear that authorities can take necessary security precautions, but a complete shutdown of public services or excessive restrictions should be avoided.
The directions came as Delhi prepared for the demonstrations scheduled for October 10, with security arrangements and traffic management emerging as key concerns for residents and commuters.
