More

    Attorney General doesn’t come under RTI: Delhi HC

    Must Read

    Covid 19 cases reached 14688 in Vadodara after 97 new cases on Tuesday

    Total 108 discharged from hospital taking the total to 12957 Covid 19 cases in...

    BCC distributed cheques to children under Savera Educational Sponsorship Programme

    Baroda Citizens Council implemented the project ‘SAVERA EDUCATIONAL SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM’ which aims to support the educational fees...

    PM Modi speaks to beneficiaries of PM SVANidhi Scheme from UP

    Prime Minister Narendra Modi today urged people of the country to not to become lenient about precautions...

    The Delhi High Court on Friday ruled that the office of the Attorney General of India does not come within the ambit of the Right to Infomation Act, saying its “predominant function” is to give advice on legal matters to the government.

    A division bench of Chief Justice G. Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath said that the Attorney General appears in court on behalf of the government of India and has fiduciary relationship with the government and his opinions cannot be put in the public domain.

    The court set aside a March 2015 verdict by a single judge, which said the office of the top law officer was answerable to public under the transparency law as he performs public functions and his appointment is governed by the Constitution.

    “Essentially, the function being that akin to an advocate of the government of India, he is in a fiduciary relationship with the government of India and cannot put in the public domain his opinions or the materials forwarded to him by the government of India,” a bench headed by the High Court Chief Justice said while reversing the earlier order.

    The judgment added: “The essential services provided by the AG are to advice the government on legal matters and perform other duties such of a legal character as may be assigned. The AG is not a functionary reposed with any administrative or other authority which effect the rights or liabilities of persons.”

    Under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, any government office or authority or any organisation substantially funded by the government comes under the purview of the transparency law.

    The court’s order came on appeals filed by the government against the single-judge order.

    Two pleas were filed by RTI activist Subhash Chandra Agarwal and R.K. Jain before the single judge, seeking to declare the Attorney General’s office as a public authority under the RTI Act.

    One of the pleas had also challenged the Central Information Commission’s decision holding that the office was not covered under the RTI Act.

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Latest News

    PM Modi speaks to beneficiaries of PM SVANidhi Scheme from UP

    Prime Minister Narendra Modi today urged people of the country to not to become lenient about precautions...

    BCC distributed cheques to children under Savera Educational Sponsorship Programme

    Baroda Citizens Council implemented the project ‘SAVERA EDUCATIONAL SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM’ which aims to support the educational fees of more than 1000 plus...

    PM Modi speaks to beneficiaries of PM SVANidhi Scheme from UP

    Prime Minister Narendra Modi today urged people of the country to not to become lenient about precautions related to Corona during this...

    Epic TV is back with new season of its highly popular show ‘Regiment Diaries’

    Epic TV is back with new season of its highly popular show 'Regiment Diaries.' Regiment Diaries, an Epic Original, is more than...

    74th Infantry day celebrated with traditional solemnity and gaiety following all Covid-19 precautions

    To honour the supreme sacrifice of the Infantry in fighting the Pakistani raiders in Jammu and Kashmir in 1947, the 74th Infantry...

    More Articles Like This

    - Advertisement -